OneDrive Details Pane Redesign

for clarity, context, and collaboration

How might we modernize the Details Pane experience in OneDrive to improve clarity, visual hierarchy, and consistency — while supporting a new architecture being built by engineering?

🧳 ROLE
⏰ TIME
🤝 TEAM
Product Designer
2 months (May — Jun 2025)
Microsoft OneDrive
Introduction

As part of Microsoft’s vision to modernize OneDrive and unify experiences across M365, I led the redesign of the OneDrive Details Pane—an essential surface for viewing and managing file-level metadata, activity, and sharing. The goal was to modernize the visual language, improve usability, and address architectural and accessibility challenges, all while aligning with Fluent 2 design system and OneDrive's modern subsystem.


Context

The Details Pane is a core component within OneDrive, giving users quick access to essential file metadata, recent activity, and sharing controls. Despite its importance, the existing pane never had a dedicated designer to work on it, and engineers would stack metadata on top of one another with no clear architecture, resulting in both design and technical debt.

Current State
OneDrive Details Pane — No file selection
OneDrive Details Pane — Single file selection
OneDrive Details Pane — Single file selection / More Details
OneDrive Details Pane — Multi file selection
Problems

1. Legacy Architecture Constraints

The Details Pane was built on legacy architecture, which introduced multiple challenges:

⚠️ Limited flexibility to apply updated styling and layouts.

⚠️ Performance issues when rendering dynamic file activity and metadata.

⚠️ Accessibility shortcomings that made navigation and information retrieval harder for some users.

2. Outdated Visual Design & Layout

The previous Details Pane no longer aligned with OneDrive’s evolving design language and Fluent 2 standards:

⚠️ Visually dense and difficult to scan.

⚠️ Non‑intuitive grouping of file information, with important details buried.

⚠️ Inconsistent visual hierarchy and spacing compared to other OneDrive surfaces, creating a fragmented user experience.

External Auditing

I conducted an external audit of Google Drive and Dropbox to understand how comparable products present file details and metadata, identifying patterns and opportunities to inform the OneDrive redesign.

Dropbox Details Pane
Google Drive Details Pane
Rearchitecting the Information Hierarchy

I partnered with the engineer to document the current information hierarchy in Figma, then re-architected it into a proposed structure that became the foundation for my design explorations.

Current Information Architecture
Proposed Information Architecture
Design Explorations

Using the proposed information architecture as a foundation, I began exploring layout and interaction patterns for the new Details Pane. I developed four distinct design options, each testing different ways to organize content, prioritize information, and support user workflows.

Option A: Two-Tab View
Details tab open
Activity & comments tab open

Benefits:

✅ Prioritizes Details upfront

✅ Maintains familiar interaction

Tradeoffs:

⚠️ Limits discoverability of second tab

Option B: Condensed Tabs View
Details tab open
Activity tab open

Benefits:

✅ Improved scannibility of tabs

✅ More intuitive and common UX pattern (ex. Google Drive)


Tradeoffs:

⚠️ Losing visual preview when switching tabs can be jarring

Option C: Visual-First Details Pane
Details tab open
Activity tab open

Benefits:

✅ Clear file identity

✅ Immersive feeling

Tradeoffs:

⚠️ Not optimal for non-visual files (ex. spreadsheets, word documents, folder)

⚠️ Visually overpowering vs. metadata

Option D: Details Pane with Preview
Details tab open
Activity tab open

Benefits:

✅ More intuitive visual hierarchy

✅ Not as visually overpowering vs. metadata

✅ More optimal for non-visual files

I mapped the design options on an impact–effort matrix to evaluate their potential value to users against the resources required to implement them. This exercise helped me quickly identify which options balanced high user impact with feasible implementation.

Based on this analysis, Option D emerged as the strongest candidate, offering significant usability improvements without introducing major technical complexity. I then explored additional use cases to validate and refine this direction.

Exploring Use Cases

I then took Option D and explored additional use cases and edge cases to test its scalability and ensure the design held up across different scenarios.

Details Pane Redesign — No file selected
Details Pane Redesign — Folder selected

I also explored alternative approaches for selecting multiple files, resulting in Option 1 and Option 2.

Option 1 — Items stacked

Tradeoff:

⚠️ Not optimal for selecting a lot of files

Option 2 — Empty State

Benefit:

✅ Using an empty state for multi‑file selection keeps the layout cleaner, reduces visual clutter, and avoids implying that details for individual files are accessible in this context.

Final Designs

No file selected
Details View
Activity View
Multi-file selection
Impact


💥 Shipped the redesigned OneDrive details pane to 300 millions of users across web and desktop, improving visual clarity, hierarchy, and consistency
💥 Contributed to the overall OneDrive modernization efforts, bringing the product closer to Microsoft’s evolving Fluent 2 design system

Reflection

This project marked a meaningful step in my pivot from design systems into feature design. While I didn’t lead user research, I collaborated closely with PMs and engineers to shape the OneDrive details pane experience and push for clarity, consistency, and alignment across the product. It deepened my understanding of end-to-end product delivery—navigating ambiguity, iterating across multiple touchpoints, and designing with impact at scale. I’m excited to continue growing in this space, bringing systems thinking and craft into product experiences that meet real user needs.

View More